Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alan McNatty wrote: > I agree completely - just highlighting for Bruno. > > If he's going to make a Debian package for stable it will be an issue if > package has is compiled --with-pgsql and as long as 7.2 is in stable. > > On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:04, Pedro B. wrote: > >>Sorry, but doing patches to support a 7.2.x version when 7.4.x is the >>stable version, is like proposing to go back to stoneage and make fire >>by using 2 sticks. >> >>The 7.2 is completely deprecated on a postgres point of view. >> >>I do know debian-stable still uses it, but it shouldn't. 7.4.3 should >>have gone out of testing ages ago. 7.5 is halfway under development, >>because everyone in the "postgres world" (hate these tags, but they are >>sometimes needed) has implemented 7.4. >> >>These are the 2 cents from a deep-into-postgres-point of view. No,. I'm doing a package for testing, Sarge, just before it gets released. Sarge is using 7.4 (http://packages.debian.org/testing/misc/postgresql), so I guess this is not an issue, right ?