Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

"Pedro B." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
$ apt-cache showpkg postgresql
Package: postgresql
Versions:
7.4.3-3

No, it's not an issue at all. That's perfect.

\\pb



Bruno Rodrigues wrote:

> Alan McNatty wrote:
> 
>> I agree completely - just highlighting for Bruno.
>> If he's going to make a Debian package for stable it will be an issue if
>> package has is compiled --with-pgsql and as long as 7.2 is in stable. 
>> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:04, Pedro B. wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, but doing patches to support a 7.2.x version when 7.4.x is the 
>>> stable version, is like proposing to go back to stoneage and make 
>>> fire by using 2 sticks.
>>>
>>> The 7.2 is completely deprecated on a postgres point of view.
>>>
>>> I do know debian-stable still uses it, but it shouldn't. 7.4.3 should 
>>> have gone out of testing ages ago. 7.5 is halfway under development, 
>>> because everyone in the "postgres world" (hate these tags, but they 
>>> are sometimes needed) has implemented 7.4.
>>>
>>> These are the 2 cents from a deep-into-postgres-point of view.
> 
> 
> No,. I'm doing a package for testing, Sarge, just before it gets released.
> Sarge is using 7.4 (http://packages.debian.org/testing/misc/postgresql), 
> so I guess this is not an issue, right ?
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.