Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
"Pedro B." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
$ apt-cache showpkg postgresql Package: postgresql Versions: 7.4.3-3 No, it's not an issue at all. That's perfect. \\pb Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > Alan McNatty wrote: > >> I agree completely - just highlighting for Bruno. >> If he's going to make a Debian package for stable it will be an issue if >> package has is compiled --with-pgsql and as long as 7.2 is in stable. >> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:04, Pedro B. wrote: >> >>> Sorry, but doing patches to support a 7.2.x version when 7.4.x is the >>> stable version, is like proposing to go back to stoneage and make >>> fire by using 2 sticks. >>> >>> The 7.2 is completely deprecated on a postgres point of view. >>> >>> I do know debian-stable still uses it, but it shouldn't. 7.4.3 should >>> have gone out of testing ages ago. 7.5 is halfway under development, >>> because everyone in the "postgres world" (hate these tags, but they >>> are sometimes needed) has implemented 7.4. >>> >>> These are the 2 cents from a deep-into-postgres-point of view. > > > No,. I'm doing a package for testing, Sarge, just before it gets released. > Sarge is using 7.4 (http://packages.debian.org/testing/misc/postgresql), > so I guess this is not an issue, right ? > > >