Re: [PATCH] include destination into dlr lookup (#2)

Enver ALTIN wrote:

> On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 18:03 +0300, Enver ALTIN wrote:
>> At a glance, looks good to me. I think I'll try a quick test with my
>> weird-acting UCP service provider tomorrow :)
> 
> BTW, let me explain what "weird-acting" means, in case it may sched a
> light for something else. I'm sending a message to a recipient, with a
> destination like "+456781234567" but the resulting DLR message says the
> recipient of the original message was "06781234567". Cool, eh? :)

that's why I say, we can't use direct db lookup ;) and with proposed patch,
it just works ;)

-- 
Thanks,
Alex