Re: [PATCH] include destination into dlr lookup (#2)

Hi Alexander,

On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 17:26 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> that's why I say, we can't use direct db lookup ;) and with proposed patch,
> it just works ;)

Oh, well. Reading the older thread about this subject Guillaume
Cottenceau pointed me to[1] a while ago, I liked the "I will tell how
SMSC works about this stuff in config file" idea better, but I fully
agree that making it work before making it faster is important.

Thanks for investigating this, I owe you a beer (or two). Anyway, I had
a locally patched internal/mysql storage working very well for my
needs :)

Keep up the great work,

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02965.html
-- 
Enver ALTIN                   |        http://skyblue.gen.tr/
Software developer @ Parkyeri |      http://www.parkyeri.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBVt5DZCB2FZvqK0sRAsMDAJ92bgIbqMnLM5Gk6/3r9frcn0aZAgCfUD9u
dhbO2AECVT+hxDXXK/ccdzs=
=ULzW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----