Re: [RFC] sqlbox as own cvs module - votes please

Hi,

I'm also +1 but don't see a easy way to handle such things with CVS (and
again my ++1 for subversion switch ;)).

Stipe Tolj wrote:

> Hi list,
> 
> I'd like to promote Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> to gain cvs write
> access in order to contribute his sqlbox as own cvs module.
> 
> He is willing to put it under Kannel projection and maintain it inside the
> cvs module. Which would also allow easier participation of other
> developers in interest of it.
> 
> So, we need at least 2 more +1 votes from core developers with cvs write
> access to get hime going. Votes please.
> 
> (Which does not mean others are forbidden to mention their votes as part
> of an open way in decission making).
> 
> @Rene: is there a clean way in how to treat the sqlbox cvs module as
> add-on component to the core gateway module? Please have some thoughts on
> this issue. Generally we should formalize on how such an add-on
> configure/make/install process should look like.
> 
> Stipe
> 
> mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
> 
> Vogelsanger Weg 80
> 40470 DÃŒsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> phone: +49.211.74845.0
> fax: +49.211.74845.299
> 
> mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
> http://www.wapme-systems.de/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Thanks,
Alex