Re: messageid DLR parameter

> Davy Chan wrote:
>
> > I might represent the extreme case of Kannel porting. I haven't
> > seen anyone on the net talking about Kannel on an ARM7 processor
> > (although we kind of talked about the possibility of Kannel on
> > the Dragonball [a la Palm] or StrongARM [a la iPaq] in Hong Kong
> > back in 2000). But, I'm sure crazy people like me are out there.
>
> I hope there are more of those outside too ;)
>
> > Don't think that limited resources are ONLY due to old equipment.
> > Cost and space is another issue.  You'ld be surprised at some
> > places Kannel code has been embedded into. Ever wonder how some
> > of those long-haul trucking companies keep track of their trucks?
>
> good example.
>
> Stipe

Indeed?? kannel is just so not embedded friendly, what with the separate
processes as they are...
if i were to embed something along these lines, i'd choose which i/f it be
using smpp,whatever,
and use that code, and build frm there, i don't see much anything else in
kannel that i'd want....
and again we're talking about that damned lowest common denominator.....
Please stick to where i bet most are using it,or want to use it,  gateways
to the telcos,  and for large amount of
traffic - spreading the load over multiple m/cs etc etc, ie the big
picture!! isn't that why its "architected" the way it is?