Re: [PATCH] Addition Of http-proxy-port-exceptions

Jonathan Houser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
	  Stipe,

> ok, first of all thanks for submitting the patch. I'm +0 on this, in the 
> current version.
> 
> The reason is: As this is an add-on to the existing 
> 'http-proxy-exceptions' config directive, which contains hostnames that 
> are avoided to be proxied, and actually both, the old and your new 
> config directive yield to a binary decission: yes, proxy, or no, do not 
> proxy -- how about using regex expressions here in a single config 
> directive?
> 
> I'm not quite sure about how, but I suppose this should be fairly 
> possible, in the regex notation that '<scheme>://<hostname>:<port>' 
> identifies a request target.
> 
> So you may obviosly "block" any proxying via specifying a regex 
> expression that starts with "https" and leaves the hostname and port 
> open. Others could explicetly block proxying ot specific ports or 
> hostnames, etc.
> 
> IMO, this regex config directive would be actually more powerfull in 
> terms of "reducing" the necessary steps to add some specific rules for 
> proxying?!

      I had actually considered the regex approach looking for 
"https://" as well.  I think I went with the one I did mainly because it 
seemed less intrusive (thus less likely to break other people's config 
files) than the patch I submitted.  I'll happily look into the regex 
approach if that's what you'd rather have.

Jon
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.