smsbox to bearerbox ack / nack
Ben Suffolk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I have been doing some investigation into tighter integration of my application with kannel. As such I have been writing some applications that communicate directly with bearerbox, connecting to the smsbox port. For sake of simplicity lets call my app mysmsbox. What I noticed was that when a message is sent from bearebox it stays in the storefile until an ack is sent back. This is great if mysmsbox dies before it has done processing the message. But I also notice that if you send ack_success or ack_failed back to bearerbox it seems to make no difference. Ideally I think it would be better if you sent back ack_failed for bearebox to requeue the message (possibly after some small time delay). This way if you were unable to process the message for some reason a different mysmsbox has the chance to do it. Under the current situation you have to wait for the current box to be in a situation where it can now process the message, or it needs to restart in order to allow another mysmsbox a chance. In the situation where you only have 1 smsbox type app connected it really makes no difference. But if you are looking for a more resilient solution then multiple smsbox apps on different servers is the way forward, but only if you have a way of failing messages over from one smsbox to another. I'd be interested in peoples comments, and how easy they think it will be to implement. Regards Ben