Re: MO Concatenation

+1 for me too, on a practical and functional level. Can't comment on
the way it works as my c isn't up to much! Alex

On 1/5/07, Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/5/07, Paul Bagyenda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think Alex is talking about something different. You are talking
> > about MT concatenation.
> >
> > To answer Alex's question: Yes I submitted the patch a while back.
> > AFAIK it is not yet on CVS. More votes in favour from you and others
> > might change that...
> >
> > Paul.
> >
>
> I vote in favour of that too. I have been looking for that patch too.
>
> > On Jan 05, 2007, at 10:11, Enver ALTIN wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > On 1/3/07, Alex Kinch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> I'm sure I saw a patch floating around a while ago to re-assemble
> > >> concatenated MO within Kannel. Did it make 1.4.1 stable - or is it
> > >> still in CVS?
> > >
> > > Kannel supported that for ages, just enable concatenation=1 in your
> > > SMSC configuration and it should work.
> > > --
> > > Enver
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5
> items
>
>