RE: MO Concatenation

Actually the patch crashed on me twice but never got into trying to debug or report since this was on a production system and we decided to do the concatenation part on our own. 

Yet the patch crashes on heavy traffic.

If anyone needs logs of the crashes I'll be happy to provide them. I cannot recall if the logs where on debug at the time.

Dimitris Evmorfopoulos

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Kinch [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 7:00 PM
To: Rogelio Serrano; Paul Bagyenda; Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: MO Concatenation

+1 for me too, on a practical and functional level. Can't comment on
the way it works as my c isn't up to much! Alex

On 1/5/07, Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/5/07, Paul Bagyenda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think Alex is talking about something different. You are talking
> > about MT concatenation.
> >
> > To answer Alex's question: Yes I submitted the patch a while back.
> > AFAIK it is not yet on CVS. More votes in favour from you and others
> > might change that...
> >
> > Paul.
> >
>
> I vote in favour of that too. I have been looking for that patch too.
>
> > On Jan 05, 2007, at 10:11, Enver ALTIN wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > On 1/3/07, Alex Kinch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> I'm sure I saw a patch floating around a while ago to re-assemble
> > >> concatenated MO within Kannel. Did it make 1.4.1 stable - or is it
> > >> still in CVS?
> > >
> > > Kannel supported that for ages, just enable concatenation=1 in your
> > > SMSC configuration and it should work.
> > > --
> > > Enver
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5
> items
>
>