Re: [PATCH] MO concat

Hi,

seems patch works OK because no objections/bug reports :)

commited to cvs.

P. A. Bagyenda wrote:

> I have gone over the code and it looks fine, and is an improvement on
> what I'd proposed -- thanks Alex. Will also endeavour to test, but a
> definite +1 on my part.
> 
> 
> On May 16, 2007, at 16:18, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>
>>> new version with a small bug fix.
>>
>> I'm kindly requesting the group to test this patch from Alex. As we
>> see he put a
>> lot of work and effort into it, so it should be credited by core
>> group people
>> testing this and providing a vote.
>>
>> Stipe
>>
>> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Kölner Landstrasse 419
>> 40589 DÃŒsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>>
>> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
>> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>>
>> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
>> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>
>> iD8DBQFGSwSz9ez0oeKvYs0RAj0PAJ4saIgGMrbNvOLrL5f7Ud4ht5HkCgCeISTI
>> Q1MCrKAgi7cAJyAgSjVu604=
>> =H1Pm
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Thanks,
Alex