Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support

Yep,

But UCP 01 is stated as legacy operation.
And should be remove in the future version of the UCP protocol.
This has been keeped for backward compatibility.

Vincent.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Fink" <[email protected]>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>; "devel Devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] empty msg->sms.sender support


> 
> On 02.02.2008, at 13:17, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> 
>> Andreas Fink schrieb:
>>> the only way to have it empty is to use an operation 01 instead of  
>>> 51...
>>
>> is that transparently?
>>
> 
> This is definitively true for  CMG's SMSC's.
> 
>> Which means we check within gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c if we have source  
>> addr, if we have use UCP 51, if not (hence empty) use UCP 01. With  
>> the same "rest" of the data?
> 
> The packet format is different for 01 than 51. There are less fields.  
> But not that much different.
> 
> 
> 
>