Re: membox progress
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | tolj.org system architecture |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
> I'm fixing some stuff on my local version, will update it probably on
> the weekend.
Hi Alejandro,
it would be great if you use the CVS module really actively. I just want to
avoid you run into the same "caveats" we (the other Kannel developers) do for
the 'gateway' module, where we develop in local working copies and commit after
we "stabilize" code.
The membox module should run a faster commit/review cycle in the CVS repository,
to allow OTHERS to participate actively. Otherwise all others have to "wait"
until you commit your "milestone points" to the CVS, which makes cycles again
too long.
It's ok if when you commit code to the CVS module, even if it's not "finished"
and considered unstable. That's why we have the TAG and BRANCH constructs in CVS.
I simply want others to "join you", since the interest will be present a lot.
I'm also encouraging anyone interested to create a multi-language bridge for
Kannel to look at SWIG (http://www.swig.org). Emagining a lot of application
people out there would love to see a native Kannel bearerbox <-> Java bridge.
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------