Re: membox progress

Stipe,

Ok, acknowledged. Makes a lot of sense, in fact.

I'll commit what I've done so far (even unstable) during the weekend, so
others can join the effort.

Regards,

Alejandro Guerrieri

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
>
> > I'm fixing some stuff on my local version, will update it probably on
> > the weekend.
> >
>
> Hi Alejandro,
>
> it would be great if you use the CVS module really actively. I just want
> to avoid you run into the same "caveats" we (the other Kannel developers) do
> for the 'gateway' module, where we develop in local working copies and
> commit after we "stabilize" code.
>
> The membox module should run a faster commit/review cycle in the CVS
> repository, to allow OTHERS to participate actively. Otherwise all others
> have to "wait" until you commit your "milestone points" to the CVS, which
> makes cycles again too long.
>
> It's ok if when you commit code to the CVS module, even if it's not
> "finished" and considered unstable. That's why we have the TAG and BRANCH
> constructs in CVS.
>
> I simply want others to "join you", since the interest will be present a
> lot.
>
> I'm also encouraging anyone interested to create a multi-language bridge
> for Kannel to look at SWIG (http://www.swig.org). Emagining a lot of
> application people out there would love to see a native Kannel bearerbox <->
> Java bridge.
>
> Stipe
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org <st_%7Bat%7D_tolj.org>           mailto:
> stolj_{at}_kannel.org <stolj_%7Bat%7D_kannel.org>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>