Re: Meta-Data documentation

Can we update the 1.4.1 documentation to reflect this ?



On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 10:10 -0400, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Alexander Malysh schrieb:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > great thanks!
> > 
> > Could you please better describe meta-data format because it unclear how
> > to code it, here is the format accepted by meta-data patch:
> > 
> > meta-data = ?URLENCODE(group-name)?URLENCODE(key1)=URLENCODE(value1)...
> > 
> > then if you send it e.g. for MT:
> > 
> > .../sendsms?meta-data=URLENCODE(meta-data)
> 
> great wok Alejandro.
> 
> Agree'ing with Alex here. The encoding format of the HTTP GET 'meta-data' value
> has to be clear from the user's guide, especially the usage of the '?' question
> marks to separate the SMSC protocol module parts of the whole string.
> 
> In fact I would generalize like this:
> 
>   data = ?<smsc-type1>?key1=value1&key2=value2&...?<smsc-type2>?key1=value1&...
>   meta-data = urlencode( data )
> 
> Stipe
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kölner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
> 
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>