Re: Claro http communication

"Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <000701c9dd7d$d9603060$02b2a8c0@tardis>
Hi,

Besides, only MTs are pushed through kannel's HTTP interface. MO's are not. 
Hervi clearly talks about MOs. kannel also offers all these nifty 
sms-services, which would have to be built from scratch.

An interesting question is how do you receive SMS over HTTP. Do you poll the 
SMSc HTTP every 5" to see if there are any new SMS or DLRs?

BR,
Nikos

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juan Nin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: Claro http communication


Milan,

There are already several HTTP SMSC specific implementations on
Kannel, the ones that HervΞΉ mentioned are some of them.

Of course you can do it directly without Kannel, but it's a good
approach to do it via Kannel, so that you always use it as your
gateway and not one method for some carriers and another one for
others, It's also nice to do it via Kannel cause it already implements
stuff like it's internal queue, etc

Regards,

-- 
Juan Nin
3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands
http://www.3cinteractive.com


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Milan P. Stanic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 18:14, HervΞΉ Nicol wrote:
>> We have to send / receive SMS and DLRs over Claro (brazilian telco). We
>> will communicate with them by HTTP.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> If we write a patch for kannel for operator-specific HTML communication
>> (just like for Clickatell, Brunet, 3united.com...), is there any chance
>> that it may be included in Kannel CVS?
>
> You have to communicate with kannel over HTTP. Kannel have to
> communicate with provider over HTTP. Why you could not communicate with
> provider over HTTP without kannel.
> What should be role of the kannel in your case?
>
> I don't like to say that you do not have good reason for that. I'm just
> curious.
>
>> Do you have some special hints / advices on how to proceed?
>> It won't be too hard for us to write this code considering the existing
>> operator-specific code, but it costs nothing to ask for some advice
>> before starting to work on it ;)
>
> --
> Kind regards, Milan
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.