Re: Claro http communication

Well, this implementations are nowadays confined to gw/smsc_http.c, so  
it's quite simple to add a new one without bloating the rest of the  
code.

Until someone comes with some a-la-apxs pluggable architecture (any  
volunteers? ;) ), that's the way to do it. Not as clean as it could  
be, but fair enough imho.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 25/05/2009, at 23:09, Milan P. Stanic wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 17:28, Juan Nin wrote:
>> There are already several HTTP SMSC specific implementations on
>> Kannel, the ones that Hervé mentioned are some of them.
>
> Kannel supports SMPP, EMI, UCP, AT, several HTTP and the others
> protocols. I hope that the kannel will not become to bloated if we
> tried to push every variant of HTTP specific implementation into it.
>
>> Of course you can do it directly without Kannel, but it's a good
>> approach to do it via Kannel, so that you always use it as your
>> gateway and not one method for some carriers and another one for
>> others, It's also nice to do it via Kannel cause it already  
>> implements
>> stuff like it's internal queue, etc
>
> -- 
> Kind regards,  Milan
>