Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c

Hi,

AFAIK ton and npi always bundled together. Therefore I don't see  
reason to define only one value...

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 09.11.2009 um 10:54 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

> Hi,
>
> I don't see a reason to keep these variables bundled. ton is more  
> frequently changed. npi almost never does. They mean different  
> things, and are independent of each other. Why not give user the  
> choice to set whatever they need in configuration? Same holds for  
> source-addr-ton & npi.
>
> I think it makes more sense to patch the source. In either case if  
> you decide to go with the guide, I can submit that as well. One of  
> the two has to be patche, though.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alexander Malysh
> To: Nikos Balkanas
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't see reason to apply this patch. User can just define ton and  
> npi settings. Maybe userguide patch
> would be more helpful?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander Malysh
>
> Am 02.11.2009 um 12:31 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is another one in my series of trivial patches. This part of  
>> the configuration has caused a lot of confusion in manual  
>> configuring dest-addr-ton over the years, with users prefixing  
>> their numbers with '+' instead of using the configuration.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> <smsc_smpp.diff>
>
>