Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)

Hi,

we cannot predict the alias from the MSISDN
this was designed for ;)

Also, This should IMO be mentionned into the source
of the driver, that we cannot send 2mt within the same sec
for the same dest/alias because, this is an known
limitation of the protocol.

Vincent.


Le 21/07/2010 13:52, Nikos Balkanas a écrit :
> Hi Vincent,
>
> In this version, this patch will not affect other than EMI and CIMD2  DLRs. SMPP for example doesn't match against destination. However, EMI and CIMD2 do. Not
> to worry, though. Such a condition was anticipated. Mechanism was implemented to quickly switch from driver-specific to smsc configuration specific. Therefore
> with a minor change destination matching could be disabled for those smscs that use such encryption.
>
> However, that would mean that patch wouldn't apply for these cases, ie, DLRs received at the same time. A better way would be to calculate the encryption and
> implement it when used. Is there a way to predict it? How can I get more info about it?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
> Hi nikos,
>
> 'alias' is an "crypted" MSISDN done by the operator-side
> to protect the customer (avoid spamming, and any abuses)
> This actually exists here in fr but i assume,
> this also exists on other countries
>
> I just want to be sure this will not
> break any existing installations.
>
> Vincent.
>
>
> Le 21/07/2010 12:16, Nikos Balkanas a Γ©crit :
>> @Vincent: With respect to destination alias, what do you mean? Looking for alias in gwlib/cfg.def I cannot find anything relevant.
>
>