Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)

Hi Vincent,

your patch for userguide is highly welcome :)

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 21.07.2010 um 14:12 schrieb Vincent CHAVANIS:

> Hi,
> 
> we cannot predict the alias from the MSISDN
> this was designed for ;)
> 
> Also, This should IMO be mentionned into the source
> of the driver, that we cannot send 2mt within the same sec
> for the same dest/alias because, this is an known
> limitation of the protocol.
> 
> Vincent.
> 
> 
> Le 21/07/2010 13:52, Nikos Balkanas a écrit :
>> Hi Vincent,
>> 
>> In this version, this patch will not affect other than EMI and CIMD2  DLRs. SMPP for example doesn't match against destination. However, EMI and CIMD2 do. Not
>> to worry, though. Such a condition was anticipated. Mechanism was implemented to quickly switch from driver-specific to smsc configuration specific. Therefore
>> with a minor change destination matching could be disabled for those smscs that use such encryption.
>> 
>> However, that would mean that patch wouldn't apply for these cases, ie, DLRs received at the same time. A better way would be to calculate the encryption and
>> implement it when used. Is there a way to predict it? How can I get more info about it?
>> 
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent CHAVANIS" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>> 
>> 
>> Hi nikos,
>> 
>> 'alias' is an "crypted" MSISDN done by the operator-side
>> to protect the customer (avoid spamming, and any abuses)
>> This actually exists here in fr but i assume,
>> this also exists on other countries
>> 
>> I just want to be sure this will not
>> break any existing installations.
>> 
>> Vincent.
>> 
>> 
>> Le 21/07/2010 12:16, Nikos Balkanas a Γ©crit :
>>> @Vincent: With respect to destination alias, what do you mean? Looking for alias in gwlib/cfg.def I cannot find anything relevant.
>> 
>> 
> 
>