Re: MT Message Ack

Hi Alex,

The setup is not necessarily limited to a single server. Bb could be to
another server than smsbox, even to different physical locations.
Communication could be TCP over WAN. Network can cause a lot of failures and
lost packages, beyond TCP retransmission.

Are not ACKs implemented in smsbox? I have not seen the sources, yet.

BR,
Nikos

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> why do you need retry between smsbox and bearerbox? bearerbox gives ack
> immediately and if
> not this is some strange bug that should be fixed.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> Am 02.09.2011 um 11:32 schrieb JAmes:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> So you need to restart smsbox for it to retry sending the message to
> bearerbox?
>
> Regards,
> J
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> smsbox does resend only by restart.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>> Am 02.09.2011 um 10:16 schrieb James:
>>
>> Thanks Nikos.
>>
>> Do you know the wait time before smsbox considers to resend the message?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> J
>>
>> On 02/09/2011, at 3:12 PM, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am pretty sure they both wait for an ACK, according to architecture.
>> Else they wouldn't work at all. Standard procedure for all smsbox clients is
>> to resend the SMS if they don't receive an ACK from bb.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:19 AM, JAmes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am wondering, when smsbox / sqlbox is connected to bearerbox and sends
>>> a MT sms, does smsbox / sqlbox wait for an ACK from BB?
>>>
>>> How does smsbox/sqlbox handle sms messages that BB doesn't ack?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> J
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>