Re: Message splits

Ok I guess not much call for this.

I've just calculated client-side it in a similar way to how it's done by
Kannel

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Doug Dixon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I find it useful to have the "Message splits" in the sendsms response
> body. However, this is not appended in the trunk version of Kannel,
> unless immediate-sendsms-reply = true. This has obvious disadvantages (less
> sanity checking).
>
> Would the maintainers be receptive to a patch that appends " Message
> splits: %d" to the response body when:
>
> concatenation = true
> immediate-sendsms-reply = false
>
> Or, if modifying the response body would be considered an unacceptable
> compatibility breaker, would an HTTP response header be acceptable?
>
> Thanks
> Doug
>



-- 
*Doug Dixon *|* CTO* | *Run The Red* | M +64 21 992 753

*[image: cid:3317968016_4849303]*