Re: Votes for opensmppbox

imho a new clean copy development will be better. easier to read, easier to debug, and somehow will be faster development time.



On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote:

> The latest opensmppbox head revision keeps giving me headaches.
>  
> For example, if use-smppbox-id = true, then it doesn’t store dlr information.
>  
> Also, the redundant code of box-dlr.c is a little bit too much for me.
>  
> Besides that I received a useful routing patch. But that one depends on opensmppbox before the use-smppbox-id patch.
>  
> What I would like is to make a separate branch of the current opensmppbox. And then start with a clean copy where we can start developing on again.
>  
> Does this make sense?
>  
> == Rene
>  

Willy Mularto
F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)