Re: Votes for opensmppbox

I vote +1 for new stable extended OpenSMPPBox with clean documentation and
configuration examples!

2012/12/9 Willy Mularto <[email protected]>

> imho a new clean copy development will be better. easier to read, easier
> to debug, and somehow will be faster development time.
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
>
> The latest opensmppbox head revision keeps giving me headaches.****
> ** **
> For example, if use-smppbox-id = true, then it doesn’t store dlr
> information.****
> ** **
> Also, the redundant code of box-dlr.c is a little bit too much for me.****
> ** **
> Besides that I received a useful routing patch. But that one depends on
> opensmppbox before the use-smppbox-id patch.****
> ** **
> What I would like is to make a separate branch of the current opensmppbox.
> And then start with a clean copy where we can start developing on again.**
> **
> ** **
> Does this make sense?****
> ** **
> == Rene****
> ** **
>
>
> Willy Mularto
> F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>