Re: aria-describedat?
david bolter <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:02:05 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEO7jQC+S7+kPjbwiPmtpLBfdU+3YDcXiBvY1DiY=+pSkf-Pmw@mail.gmail.com> |
I didn't follow it either. Anyone? D On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Alexander Surkov < [email protected]> wrote: > longdesc is exposed as accessible action. If aria-describedat is > supposed to replace longdesc then we should expose it the same way. I > didn't follow the discussion about aria-describedat vs longdesc so > what's the result of it? > Alex. > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:15 AM, david bolter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I was just told a new attribute is being proposed called > "aria-describedat" > > which expects a URL value. We could expose this via IA2/ATK object > > attributes. Feedback wanted. Note this might eventually put the longdesc > > debate to rest. > > > > Cheers, > > David > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-accessibility mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-accessibility >