Re: aria-describedat?
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:17:07 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEhSh3fV0cSJwwkknv1be5S==myrX++uigEpfKOC72YXncTSsg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, david bolter <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't follow it either. Anyone? The HTML a11y TF (a joint effort of PFWG and HTML WG) at least nominally supports a Change Proposal to make @longdesc conforming in HTML5. PFWG is also investigating specifying an aria-describedat ARIA property. To say the least, it's not clear that @aria-describedat is a functional replacement for @longdesc. ARIA is in practice used to communicate to AT; @longdesc is supposed to be exposed to all users via mainstream browser UI. With that in mind, would there be any interest in tackling: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=longdesc Perhaps along the lines of: http://my.opera.com/chaals/blog/tell-me-more Or even a more basic implementation as in iCab and Opera? I don't see why a name change should make a difference here, but if there's no interest in implementing browser UI for @longdesc, would there be any interest in implementing such UI for @aria-describedat? Original thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Mar/0015.html -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis