Re: aria-describedat?
Alexander Surkov <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:02:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+epNsdZ+sT_ijquQ++=YGHc6-u2776r+YK7tt-2UOyx3Z62ZQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Yeah, iirc, we had a patch to make aria-describedby acting as longdesc but never landed it. So if ARIA is going to have aria-describedat for that then we could pick it up. Currently longdesc action opens a new window with the longdesc URI. Alex. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12-03-13 11:27 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >> >> longdesc is exposed as accessible action. > > > Good to know. > > Part of the inspiration for aria-describedat was a claim that > aria-describedby could be used instead of @longdesc. The ARIA working group > disagrees with that assessment: aria-describedby is for descriptions that > are on the same page as the accessible they are describing, and is exposed > as the accessible description property in the a11y API. > > I've wondered that if aria-describedby == accDescription, then what does > longdesc correspond to? Exposing it as an accessible action makes sense, > since the user experience is to go to another page for the description. It > acts like a link (sort of). > > Is that what "exposed as an accessible action" means, Alex? > > Thanks. > > -- > ;;;;joseph. > > > 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.' > 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.' > - J. D. Klaun - > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-accessibility mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-accessibility