Re: aria-describedat?

Alexander Surkov <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:02:36 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility
Message-ID <CA+epNsdZ+sT_ijquQ++=YGHc6-u2776r+YK7tt-2UOyx3Z62ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Yeah, iirc, we had a patch to make aria-describedby acting as longdesc
but never landed it. So if ARIA is going to have aria-describedat for
that then we could pick it up.

Currently longdesc action opens a new window with the longdesc URI.

Alex.


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12-03-13 11:27 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>>
>> longdesc is exposed as accessible action.
>
>
> Good to know.
>
> Part of the inspiration for aria-describedat was a claim that
> aria-describedby could be used instead of @longdesc.  The ARIA working group
> disagrees with that assessment:  aria-describedby is for descriptions that
> are on the same page as the accessible they are describing, and is exposed
> as the accessible description property in the a11y API.
>
> I've wondered that if aria-describedby == accDescription, then what does
> longdesc correspond to?  Exposing it as an accessible action makes sense,
> since the user experience is to go to another page for the description.  It
> acts like a link (sort of).
>
> Is that what "exposed as an accessible action" means, Alex?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> ;;;;joseph.
>
>
> 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
> 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
>             - J. D. Klaun -
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-accessibility mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-accessibility