Re: C-SDK Question - Multithreaded Client

Parag Warudkar wrote:
> If I did not concurrently share the LDAP* between threads, but I still
> used one LDAP* between different threads at different time (Connection
> pool scenario - connections randomly handed over to threads and reused
> but at any given point in time one LDAP* is used by only one thread
> exclusively) and if I had to use plain libldap, do I need to provide
> my own get/set errno and mutex lock/unlock or just get/set errno or
> none?

none.

> prldap seems to be using only get/set errno if the LDAP* is not shared
> and both get/set errno and mutex alloc/free lock/unlock if it is
> shared. The only question is what does shared mean - concurrently used
> by different threads or shared as in a connection pool or both?

"concurrently used by different threads".