Re: Different DOM level

byang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.dom
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <4291c0dc-46ba-49a2-8681-26ac6fd2bc1b@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On Aug 8, 8:32 pm, Martin Honnen <[email protected]> wrote:
> byang wrote:
> >    W3C propose three different DOM levels, I am wondering what are the
> > relationship between these different levels. Could anybody tell me
> > that whether the old one is out of date when the newer is published?
>
> Some DOM modules have been improved and extended with the different
> levels, for instance there is W3C DOM Level 2 Corehttp://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/and there is also W3C DOM Level 3
> Corehttp://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/where the DOM Level 3 Core
> specification extends the DOM Level 2 Core specification.
>
> Other modules exist only at a certain level, for instance Views, Style,
> and Traversal and Range have only been published in level 2, Load and
> Save, and Validation only in level 3.
>
> The older levels are still recommendations, whether they apply to your
> situation depends on your implementation, most browsers like Mozilla and
> Opera have long moved to support DOM Level 2 Core and HTML and the W3C
> DOM Level 2 modules like Events, or Traversal and Range. And Mozilla and
> Opera have even implemented some properties of DOM Level 3 Core. IE
> however has not made that move, both its HTML and its XML DOM are close
> to W3C DOM Level 1, plus lots of proprietary extensions (e.g. innerHTML,
> outerHTML with the HTML DOM, XPath with selectNodes/selectSingleNod with
> the XML DOM).

Thank you for your reply, Martin.
And that means there are three levels of implementation in Mozilla,
right?

Regards!
Bo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.