Re: JSD: Multiple users
"Justin Wood (Callek)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Ross wrote:
> JSD rocks. That's all well and good.
>
> But it can only be intimate with one front end at a time without things
> going really pear-shaped.
>
> My question is two-fold. Should there be some way to say "I'm using JSD,
> hands off" so that all (sane) debuggers can see that something else is
> involved and just error instead of messing, or should JSD support
> multiple clients? (wont that be fun to code?)
>
> Could the latter option even be realistically done?
>
I would do something (if possible) like:
>Client Debugger "I want to Debug You"
>JS App< "I'm using JSD Hands Off"
>Client Debugger< "But I need to Debug this _myself_, I don't care who
else is debugging".
>JS App to running debugger< "Recieved an interrupt request, object if
you need to cancel"
>Running Debugger< [No response in 30sec (?)]
>JS App< "Ok, you got the debugger."
IOW, provide an ability for a new JSD instance to cancel the old.
Again, this is "iff possible" ('iff' spelled correctly in this case).
I do not feel supporting multiple clients is worth the effort involved,
honestly.
~Justin Wood (Callek)