supporting TX_EXE
[email protected] 7 Mar 2007 14:06:41 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.layout.xslt |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, I'm working on a fix for bugzilla 94270 -- adding support for namespaces. I see a lot of #ifdef / #ifndef TX_EXE in the transformiix code. I'm wondering whether I need to write the code to work with the assumption that TX_EXE is defined, or isn't defined, or both. Peter VdB's patch at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=149205 seems to be written for the case where TX_EXE is not defined. Based on http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Building_TransforMiiX_standalone, I get the impression that TX_EXE indicates a standalone build? Looking at http://www.nabble.com/checkout---build-TransforMiiX-(standalone)-t1818776.html, it sounds like the standalone build is not really supported anymore. (There doesn't seem to be a reply to that message.) So... can I assume TX_EXE will not be defined? Seems like a fair bit more work if I have to code for both possibilities. (Especially research... and I'm brand-new to Tx.) Thanks, Lars