Re: 38.0 & 38.0.5: An update on the upflits and branches

"Nicolas B. Pierron" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 04/23/2015 11:16 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you are probably aware, we are going to publish a release between 38 & 39 (called 38.0.5).
>
> In order to continue the development of 38 & 38.0.5 in parallel, we merged mozilla-beta (m-b)
> into mozilla-release (m-r).
>
> Before:
> m-b = 38.0.0 beta
> m-r = 37.0.2
>
> Now:
> m-b = 38.0.5 beta (even if we won't build any for now)
> m-r = 38.0 beta (next one being beta7)
>
> We will do regular m-r => m-b merges to make sure 38.0.5 is up to date.
>
> This does not impact aurora (aka 39). In case we have to make a new 37 dot release, we would use
> a relbranch.
>
> The m-b tree is closed avoid any confusion.
>
> Last but not least, uplift requests to 38 should be filled for mozilla-release
> 38.0.5 would be mozilla-beta. However, release managers and sheriffs will translate the information
> if the uplift requests are incorrect.

I don't understand all the consequences, can you clarify the following 
questions:
  - Are we removing the definitely beta-cycle, or only for this version?
  - As I understand m-r is our new beta? Then, why swapping the 2?
  - 38.0.5 version seems to suggests that this is a security fix of 38.0, if 
this is for a adding a feature, why not naming it 38.1.0?  Otherwise, why 
are we not making builds of 38.0.5?


-- 
Nicolas B. Pierron
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.