Re: 38.0 & 38.0.5: An update on the upflits and branches
"Nicolas B. Pierron" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/23/2015 11:16 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > As you are probably aware, we are going to publish a release between 38 & 39 (called 38.0.5). > > In order to continue the development of 38 & 38.0.5 in parallel, we merged mozilla-beta (m-b) > into mozilla-release (m-r). > > Before: > m-b = 38.0.0 beta > m-r = 37.0.2 > > Now: > m-b = 38.0.5 beta (even if we won't build any for now) > m-r = 38.0 beta (next one being beta7) > > We will do regular m-r => m-b merges to make sure 38.0.5 is up to date. > > This does not impact aurora (aka 39). In case we have to make a new 37 dot release, we would use > a relbranch. > > The m-b tree is closed avoid any confusion. > > Last but not least, uplift requests to 38 should be filled for mozilla-release > 38.0.5 would be mozilla-beta. However, release managers and sheriffs will translate the information > if the uplift requests are incorrect. I don't understand all the consequences, can you clarify the following questions: - Are we removing the definitely beta-cycle, or only for this version? - As I understand m-r is our new beta? Then, why swapping the 2? - 38.0.5 version seems to suggests that this is a security fix of 38.0, if this is for a adding a feature, why not naming it 38.1.0? Otherwise, why are we not making builds of 38.0.5? -- Nicolas B. Pierron