Re: Minimo memory analysis
Gangadhar NPK <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:15:31 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.small-devices |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I had once asked this on the n.p.m.performance. How many of the http://www.mozilla.org/performance/ projects are still useful. Would it make sense to get a few of them to use for Minimo ? Especially http://www.mozilla.org/performance/footprint-brownbag.html and http://www.mozilla.org/performance/runtime-tracing.html. I think these projects would be very valuable for Minimo. What do you think ? --Gangadhar Doug Turner wrote: > sriram wrote: > >> I was surfing thru the internet for minimo memory usage and i stumbled >> on the following old links >> >> http://www.mozilla.org/status/2000-11-08.html >> http://www.maubi.net/mozilla/memory.html >> >> Seems like there has been a lot of activity then and have obviously >> conributed to the current stronger & better mozilla. >> But still minimo of size 13MB is huge ask on an embedded system. I >> would like to do somothing for this. I am sure someone is already >> working on this. How can i be of help ? > > > Those are very old links. I would suggest looking at > bugzilla.mozilla.org for memory leak. These bugs are usually indicated > by a mlk keyword. I would also love someone to look at what kind of > resources we are using in gtk/X11 including our handling of images. > > Also, if you have time, measure the bloat over time. You can do this by > watching the proc file system over a repeatable run of webpages. > > Yes, I would agree that 13 mb is huge for some embedded systems. Minimo > is for machines with at least 32mb of RSS. more and more devices are in > the space or better. Anything less, you aren;t going to have a true > browsing experience -- you are going to have something that is basically > another wap browser. > > Hope this helps. > doug