Re: Minimo memory analysis

Gangadhar NPK <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:15:31 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.small-devices
Organization Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I had once asked this on the n.p.m.performance. How many of the 
http://www.mozilla.org/performance/ projects are still useful. Would it 
make sense to get a few of them to use for Minimo ? Especially
http://www.mozilla.org/performance/footprint-brownbag.html and
http://www.mozilla.org/performance/runtime-tracing.html.
I think these projects would be very valuable for Minimo. What do you 
think ?
--Gangadhar

Doug Turner wrote:
> sriram wrote:
> 
>> I was surfing thru the internet for minimo memory usage and i stumbled
>> on the following old links
>>
>> http://www.mozilla.org/status/2000-11-08.html
>> http://www.maubi.net/mozilla/memory.html
>>
>> Seems like there has been a lot of activity then and have obviously
>> conributed to the current stronger & better mozilla.
>> But still minimo of size 13MB is huge ask on an embedded system. I
>> would like to do somothing for this. I am sure someone is already
>> working on this. How can i be of help ?
> 
> 
> Those are very old links.  I would suggest looking at 
> bugzilla.mozilla.org for memory leak.  These bugs are usually indicated 
> by a mlk keyword.  I would also love someone to look at what kind of 
> resources we are using in gtk/X11 including our handling of images.
> 
> Also, if you have time, measure the bloat over time.  You can do this by 
> watching the proc file system over a repeatable run of webpages.
> 
> Yes, I would agree that 13 mb is huge for some embedded systems.  Minimo 
> is for machines with at least 32mb of RSS.  more and more devices are in 
> the space or better.  Anything less, you aren;t going to have a true 
> browsing experience -- you are going to have something that is basically 
> another wap browser.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> doug