Re: Mozilla Windows CE Development
Gangadhar NPK <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:19:36 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.small-devices |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have not used WTL myself, but have heard good reviews about it. As Doug had mentioned, it might make a lot of sense to move everything towards XUL so that XUL and the XUL runtime can also gain from the improvements. --Gangadhar Mateusz Łoskot wrote: > Hi, > > First, I'd like to say thank you to Minimo's devteam! > A project like Minimo has been awaiting for long time. > > Doug Turner napisał(a): > >> [...] >> For the minimo application, we have two "front ends". These are >> native front ends -- linux uses GTK (and I have gotten a QT version >> going, but was sidetracked), and windows uses WinCE APIs. >> [...] > > > Simple question: If the source code of mozilla (and minimo) is modular > and - as I understand - UI part is separated from the logic why not to > use one of Microsoft's UI framework wrapping Win32 API and simplifying > its usage? I have one such in mind. It is called Windows Template > Library wich is published on Common Public License > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/wtl/). > > It provides ATL-based templatized framework wrapping Win32 API to build > robust and small binaries. > It is a very very thin layer just above the API. > I use it programming applications for desktop Windows OSs > and for Window CE based OSs like Pocket PC, Smartphone etc. > > What do you think? > > Greets