Re: Fund-raising SVG Fonts development
"Robert O'Callahan" <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:57:54 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.svg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Camille Bissuel <[email protected]>wrote: > I admit I don't know this subject well. > With all respect --- given that you're very passionate about this subject, you should probably take the time to become as well-informed about it as possible :-). > But SVG Fonts include "unicode", "lang", "arabic-form", "horiz-origin-x" > and "horiz-adv-x" to support right to left text and "vert-origin-y", "vert-adv-y" > up to bottom text, "ideographic", and more ... > You are probably right about OpenType shaping, but : > Isn't it enough for a start ? > Can't we wait for SVG 2.0 for Indian and diacritics languages (with all my > respect to Indian and diacritics readers) ? > No-one has made any proposals for adding general shaping support to SVG Fonts for SVG 2.0 (or in any other spec). No one has even explained how it could be done. SVG Fonts are interesting in a particular context : for graphics, and > design, like in *S*calable *V*ector *Graphics*. In such a context, > diacritics aren't a key argument for not implementing SVG Fonts. > I think you can only say that because your native language is not a heavy user of diacritics (or other complex shaping). Rob -- "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]