Re: Is the First Amendment Dead?
Ken Springer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/10/21 4:45 PM, Wolf K wrote:
> I don't think any mention is needed. The prohibition against the use of
> force is implied in "shall not make any law...". If compliance cannot be
> achieved any other way, the government will use force. That's why we say
> laws are enforceable.
Actually, I took your sentence as it could be read by someone that
physical force may be used without any law in effect.
As for the rest of your post I snipped, agreed.
--
Ken
MacOS 10.14.6
Firefox 84.0.1
Thunderbird 60.9.1
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"