Re: Karen seems to be lonely.

On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 14:26:32, Ken Springer <[email protected]> wrote 
(my responses usually follow points raised):
>On 1/14/21 1:36 PM, s|b wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 21:17:41 +0100, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
>>
>>> Now kiddies, *that* is why we use fake email addresses in a public 
>>>forum.
>>  My reply-to address is valid as is. The story of the so-called 
>>address
>> harvesting spambots is greatly exaggerated imho. Maybe true once, but
>> nowadays? Only on rare occasions do I get spam on that address.

For most news purposes, I agree. Over decades.
>
>I'd have to agree, as this is the first time I've gotten the spam.
>
At the moment, I seem to be getting one - from "Karen" only - such 
message for every one post I post here. (And I think I've had one or two 
from a loan company in the last week or two.
>
Certainly, I've seen little personal evidence that the harvesting bots 
exist to any great degree.
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

I remember a lot of questions on a vocalist forum about the problems singing
"There is a balm in Gilead" without making it sound like a security alert. -
Linda Fox in UMRA, 2010-11-19