Re: licensing specs (l20n, in particular)

Gervase Markham <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.license
Organization mozilla.org
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Axel Hecht wrote:
> I'm not sure that a fork-happy license is the right thing to do for 
> specifications.

You can't have "open" without having "forkable".

> OpenSearch is CC SA 2.5 according to 
> http://opensearch.a9.com/license.jsp (with a trademark on OpenSearch). 
> Oasis-open.org just does all rights reserved for docbook, and a custom 
> license for OpenDocument. W3C seems to be even more restrictive than 
> OpenDocument, AFAICT.

I would suggest CC BY-SA 2.5 or later, same as devmo.

Gerv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.