Re: licensing specs (l20n, in particular)

Gervase Markham wrote:
> Axel Hecht wrote:
>> I'm not sure that a fork-happy license is the right thing to do for 
>> specifications.
> 
> You can't have "open" without having "forkable".
> 
>> OpenSearch is CC SA 2.5 according to 
>> http://opensearch.a9.com/license.jsp (with a trademark on OpenSearch). 
>> Oasis-open.org just does all rights reserved for docbook, and a custom 
>> license for OpenDocument. W3C seems to be even more restrictive than 
>> OpenDocument, AFAICT.
> 
> I would suggest CC BY-SA 2.5 or later, same as devmo.
> 
> Gerv

So that it is.

Thanks

Axel