Re: Licensing of Mozilla website code
John J Barton <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:07:50 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.license |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff Balogh wrote: ... >> Please don't confuse "copyleft" with "non-commercial" or >> "non-corporate". No open source licence has any restriction on using the >> code "in a corporate setting". > > I haven't experienced it firsthand, but from what I hear on the > internet, many corporate environments avoid copyleft because they fear > the viral license. The license itself doesn't preclude commercial > usage, but the untested implications are enough to rule out copyleft > code. Use of GPL or LGPL is not such a big issue in corporations I am familiar with (IBM and HP). Redistribution is completely another matter. Developers, because they may someday work on product code, generally avoid messing with GPL source. I am able to work on Firebug because it is BSD; I'm not sure I have enough patience to talk with lawyers about MPL; I'm sure I don't for GPL. jjb