Re: Mozilla and Non-Copyleft Licensing

On 17/02/13 04:49, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Why this line "No other license is acceptable"? Or from your original
> post "We should clearly and by name forbid the use of other licenses for
> Mozilla-originated codebases, without specific permission and in
> exceptional circumstances"?
> 
> Is this solely about the requirement for the patent protection clause?

That was the driver, yes. Would you prefer a more nuanced expression?

Gerv