Re: Mozilla and Non-Copyleft Licensing

On 2/18/2013 10:15 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 17/02/13 04:49, Asa Dotzler wrote:
>> Why this line "No other license is acceptable"? Or from your original
>> post "We should clearly and by name forbid the use of other licenses for
>> Mozilla-originated codebases, without specific permission and in
>> exceptional circumstances"?
>>
>> Is this solely about the requirement for the patent protection clause?
>
> That was the driver, yes. Would you prefer a more nuanced expression?
>
> Gerv
>

Nope. I'm good.

- A