Re: Mozilla and Non-Copyleft Licensing

On 18/01/13 16:06, Gervase Markham wrote:
> [tl;dr: starting a discussion about the appropriate role of non-copyleft
> licenses with respect to Mozilla-originated projects.]

Further to this: I have had questions about patent clauses and how they
work and why they are good, and also about whether a change of licence
requires asking all the developers for permission. I have written a pair
of blog posts on these two subjects, and they can be found here:

http://blog.gerv.net/2013/02/an-introduction-to-modern-open-source-licence-patent-clauses/

http://blog.gerv.net/2013/02/relicensing-when-do-you-have-to-ask/

As before, follow-ups to mozilla.legal, please.

Gerv