Question: MultiZilla vs prefbar
"Spurr, Greg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.multizilla |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E850A28DAB65D411B8E300508BDFE3241B115843@USPLM211.txpln.us.eds.com> |
Greetings, Using: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MultiZilla/1.6.3.1c I searched in the buglist and FAQ with no luck, but I didn't want to open a bug report on an issue that may already be documented elsewhere. This issue seems to common (simple) not to have been mentioned before. Maybe I can find out from here... While I appreciate the broad functionality of MultiZilla (MZ hereafter), I find that for me, some of the overlapping functions are more conveniently provided by PrefBar (http://prefbar.mozdev.org/ <http://prefbar.mozdev.org/> - PB hereafter). However, with MZ installed, it seems to be overriding PB from time to time. I have not done extensive testing, but I have noticed that (for instance) if I try to use the PB checkboxes for Colors, Images, Proxies, etc... Mozilla ignores my choice, and the checkbox changes back to it's previous state when I click on a link, or reload a page. Other functions such as the User Agent changer, seem to work fine. Thus, although I can't give a comprehensive list, I do know that the problem is not a universal conflict between the two tools. Is this a known issue already, or should I submit a bug report for it? -GS (P.S. While MZ provides the same features and many more in most - if not all - cases, I often prefer the PB interface. Enabling/disabling images for instance is one mouse move and one mouse click in PB. It multiple mouse moves and three clicks in MZ. Just wanted to let you know the why behind my preference :)