Re: Removing Firefox Version Number
Tyler Downer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <4e8efa6f-cb59-43a3-83e8-f5ba107edd30@q12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
On Aug 16, 10:45 am, Asa Dotzler <[email protected]> wrote: > Tyler Downer wrote: > > On Aug 16, 9:51 am, Robert Kaiser<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tyler Downer schrieb: > > >>> Example of how Firefox's updating is broken. > >>> This morning, I open Firefox 5.0.1, I open the About window, Firefox > >>> begins to download Firefox 6. > >> Good. > > >>> After the update, the Addon Compatibility checker opens up, > >>> runs, and informs me that the Java Console isn't compatible with > >>> Firefox 6. I can either check for updates for it, or skip. I skip. > >> A patch just landed on Nightly to make this better in the future (this > >> code should get to release in 12 weeks unless something bad is > >> discovered in it). I sincerely hope that 99.9% of the users will never > >> enable Java Console again and this won't be a problem any more in the > >> future. > > > And I was more just meaning the Java console as the first example that > > comes to mind. But have the compatibility checker show up at all is a > > bad idea. There was one idea I heard tossed around a while back about > > having Firefox update on shutdown, instead of startup, which would > > make more sense. > > This is in the plans. It can't complete the update on shutdown, but it > can do a lot of it before shutdown so that on start-up the work left to > do is so tiny we don't need a separate update dialog. Basically once > every 6 weeks, Firefox will open a tiny fraction slower. > > Your instincts/idea on this were spot on. We're doing it. > > - A Well then, let's do it this way. Prove that you can update 95% of All Firefox users (I'd be happy with 90% even) within a reasonable time frame, make the update as seamless as possible, and without significant backlash from users and the community. Figure out a LTS plan for Enterprise (may I suggest picking one release a year to be LTS, and providing security and stability updates for it). THEN we can talk about removing the version number from About (even though I think it is a bad idea still) and moving away from "versions" as you like to say. Right now, you are putting the cart before the hose, when you don't even have a cart.