Re: Removing Firefox Version Number

Asa Dotzler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.ui
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tyler Downer wrote:

> However, there is a major flaw behind your example, which has been
> pointed out before. With a website, 100% of users are using the latest
> version, Always. They have no choice, there is no action that needs to
> be taken on their part. The website is deployed on the server, that is
> it. With Firefox, we SUCK at getting people to upgrade to the latest
> version. 66% or even worse, 52% of users running Firefox 5, and it's
> been 6 weeks since it was released. That is a total failure. IF we had
> a way of getting even 95% of total users (no Asa, not just the newest
> users, all users) on the latest version, then we can think about
> getting rid of the version number. But we don't, and Mozilla sees
> unlikely to change anything in how Firefox updates until, oh, version
> 9 or 10. By that time, what numbers will we have? 30% running the
> latest version?

Tyler, you're painting a picture that's just not accurate. We haven't 
tried to get 3.6 users on to the new system. They're still supported 
wiht security and stability updates and we've agreed to continue to do 
that for them while we sort our any plans we might have for enterprises. 
You cannot count those as rapid release users when you want to talk 
about how rapid release updates are a failure. (No one is suggesting 
removing the version number from 3.6.xx anyway.)

The only fair way to measure the success of our rapid release migration 
story is to look at the migration from 4 to 5 and starting today from 5 
to 6.

We're doing far better than the bleak picture you paint when you include 
3.6 users which are not yet a part of this change.

You also lament that we won't have a better system until Firefox 9 or 10 
(which is not completely accurate -- we've got changes we can put in 
place for 7 and 8 if we decide to that will make update much easier -- 
like add-on compat by default with a blacklist instead of a whitelist) 
and you seem to miss that the version number removal is a proposal that 
wouldn't see the light of day until just such 8 or 9 releases.

- A
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.