Re: My usability experience - Asa Dotzler should be fired

As i understand:
(besides what i'v read on several blog posts,
regarding)

This versions policy was introduced to make every Firefox
release - something special.
I was ok (besides some crazy sys-admins) on 4 release,
it wasn't ok for 5 release,
because 5 release and probably 6
has not introduced any significant changes
to UX and UI and end-users features
that is increasingly leading to misunderstanding.
(even so there are significantly important "under the hood" changes)

I propose - include 1 most popular in the month (oh, 3 weeks) add-one
in each release, or, even some of the labs feature to each new release.

Why not? are other - "closed room" - decisions are better than what people vote
up for real?

other way
i propose - get rid of the importance of the version number since it
is "unimportant"
to "end-users" at least - currently. Provide the smooth updating(i
have suggested some useful
UXfixes)
 after each bug and let it be.
Maybe - leave the Firefox (ain't Firefox is a too personal name,
for a stated "personification for user" politics?) naming at all,
aren't there people who doesn't really like foxes, or hate them,
why disrespect them? Are there many people like foxes? or fire?
i'm just curious of statistics..maybe somebody could kindly argue for me.)


Maybe -
Call it Mozilla, call every new feature by the name of some dead
species of animals  or plants
(resembling the "dead" dino of the Main Logo that kind of alive and
named Mozilla, maybe plants would
be cooler - stating their Mozilla is a vegetarian and still - very
mighty, One Of a Kind as i say)
Be cool.

Personally - i feel bad for Firefox 6,10,11
it reminds me the animals that being tortured
in one-way space ships and kinds:)

Am i the only one?

For corporations and other people which can't offer an instant updating
- there should another case, that is all.

What do you think?
Asa?