Re: Version numbers and an update from the UX team
Reuben Morais <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:14:40 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.ui |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJV00i6A4-orges3WVN_mSd5xtQyhFMeO7Sh5kdvjHcpSrvZpg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Petter Andersson <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, seriously - you behave as if I'm in some way obligated to say Good > Things about something, that cannot even in nicest of ways be > attributed to be as such. I'd be lying to myself and I'd be lying to > you. > You're not obligated to do anything, just as the Firefox team is not obligated to read your insulting rants. > > Or how would you see this as progress: > things are getting more convoluted, and you try to deprive us of any > last remaining control/knowledge we have over the situation? More > facts = better. Less facts = deliberately keeping user in the dark. > No one is depriving you from control nor knowledge. You can still configure the update system and you can still see the version number in about:support. > >> Does she really? When talking about different Firefox versions in the >> past I've seen numerous people who are confused by the small numbers - >> they don't really know the difference between a minor (3.6.13 -> >> 3.6.14) and a major (3.5 -> 3.6) update, and what they should expect >> from it. Should they even be thinking about those confusing things, >> consuming the time they could be spending being productive? > > I thought you believed in educating users? > Yes, like I said, I taught them how to use the features they care about in the new version. Version numbers are the last thing they care about. -- Reuben