Re: YUV format
Holger Waechtler <[email protected]> Sun, 29 Dec 2002 10:01:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.tarkin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
tterribe wrote: >>For example, 16 bits -> 4 bits (4:1) reduces 65536 values to 16. >>that's 1/4000th the resolution, not 1/4. > > > That's probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard you say. "bits" do not > correspond to "resolution" like that. Reducing resolution by 1/4 already > reduces four 8-bit values to one, a reduction of 1:16.8mln by your accounting, > though clearly the amount of "information" being thrown away is not that > great. Assuming a Haar wavelet transform, a 1:4 resolution reduction is > exactly equivalent to throwing away the lowest level of the coefficient tree. > I believe it is commonly accepted that reducing the resolution of images > before wavelet compression makes no sense. In this case the incoming video material already has quarter resolution U and V components, so scaling them up to full resolution makes even less sense. Holger --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.