RE: YUV format

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Monty
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 11:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [tarkin-dev] YUV format





On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 02:20:55AM -0500, tterribe wrote:
> >For example, 16 bits -> 4 bits (4:1) reduces 65536 values to 16.
> >that's 1/4000th the resolution, not 1/4.
>
> That's probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard you say.

If you say so.

> "bits" do not
> correspond to "resolution" like that. Reducing resolution by 1/4 already
> reduces four 8-bit values to one, a reduction of 1:16.8mln by your
accounting,

We were talking about color quantization, not resolution reduction.
What I said makes perfect sense in the most general case of scalar
quantization.

Monty
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'[email protected]'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.


This is getting to be quite entertaining...

Ok, ya, that didn't need to be said... ignore me.

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.